claim & proof of claim. blood is what it is...

​My question is, who are any of these tribes in relation to the Pygmy Skulls discovered in Tennessee at an archaeological level and radiologically C14 dated at approximately 40 KYA, and the Topper site in South Carolina radiologically C14 dated at 51.3 KYA? What epigraphical evidence can be shown to prove that any of these tribes were here before those dates? What haplogroups and bloodtypes are these people making claims? The names of the tribes were brought here, and the original populations were subsumed under these names of the various tribes. We know what haplogroups and autosomal carriers were here first, and we have that data. Anyone can make a claim, but blood seals the deal. Not only that, there was no epigraphical evidence of existence of any of today's named tribes at Cactus Hill site, Folsom site, Calico site, Texas Street site, Serra Da Capivara site, Toca Da Esperanza site, Miramar, Argentina site, Hueyatlaco site, etc., but there was human activity. Names denote a cultural origin, and there is no epigraphical evidence to prove that any of these names and their languages developed independently on our land, which means they all were brought here. Only blood can determine jus sanguinus status, not hearsay or claims. Everything else is a jus soli matter, and the Carthaginians made that claim long ago...